Was Saddam Hussain a good leader? 

Saddam Hussain was a decent man. He maintained order in that area by taking a firm posture and inspiring terror. WMD were nonexistent. He did not employ chemical warfare against his own people. He fought Kuwait because it was drilling diagonally into his nation's oil. He took the necessary action that a leader must take to safeguard his nation's sovereignty. Gaddafi was a capable leader as well. Gaddafi was incredibly kind to his people, providing them with housing, food, and free education. He was assassinated because he was reverting to the gold standard. Because political power manipulates the media and public opinion, the media played a part in portraying them as bad. Our duty is to think.

My Iraqi friend said that Saddam Hussein was generally a good guy and a good leader, that his people wanted for very little and that he was admirable. Was he really so bad? Were he & Gadaffi just demonized for having what the US wanted? 

Great and admirable leaders and rulers, Saddam Hussain and Gaddafi. With their leadership and wise choices, they both steered their countries in the right directions. They are both outstanding and good for the nation and its people. The best economic development and stability were found in Libya. The people may receive interest-free home loans from the Qaddafi regime. 0% APR auto loans with no markup. By providing a set sum for living expenses, the government assisted an unemployed or idle individual. They get money from selling oil and invest it in raising the living standards of their people and constructing the best and most cutting-edge infrastructure possible. No one was allowed to beg or act unlawfully under their rule. both outstanding leaders and rulers. Peace may be seen all around the nation. Namely, Libya is regarded as